Jump to content


Photo

Two-Person Crew proposed federal rulemaking and legislation


  • Please log in to reply
57 replies to this topic

#31 CNJRoss

CNJRoss

    Administrator

  • Admin
  • PipPip
  • 43896 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Fairfax, VA

Posted 06 June 2019 - 01:34 PM

The Hill, 6/3/19:

Federal decision on rail staffing sends clear sign to state and federal lawmakers

 

 

The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) recently ruled, that, when it comes to the number of crew members in the cab of a locomotive, there simply is no evidence to support the notion that two is better than one. The decision confirms that such a command-and-control policy would limit the evolution of freight railroads, which are innovating to meet growing freight demands.

 

Such definitive action sends a clear signal to federal and state lawmakers: stop pushing similar crew size legislation and leave such decisions where the belong – collective bargaining.

 

Continue here.



#32 CNJRoss

CNJRoss

    Administrator

  • Admin
  • PipPip
  • 43896 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Fairfax, VA

Posted 07 June 2019 - 06:07 AM

The Heritage Foundation, 5/22/19:
 

COMMENTARY

 

Crew Cuts: Railroad Technology Reduces Labor Costs, Improves Safety

 

By By James Gattuso

 

Key Takeaways

 

While car companies have been working to develop self-driving automobiles, the railroad industry has been deploying technology that may lead to self-driving trains.

 

The prospect of more one-person crews, never mind self-driving trains, has generated controversy.

 

Thanks to new traffic control technology, such lightly manned trains are safe, perhaps more so than today’s trains with crews.

 

 

How many railroad workers does it take to operate a freight train? Fewer that you might think.

 

While car companies have been working to develop self-driving automobiles, the railroad industry has been deploying technology that may lead to self-driving trains.

 

Known as “positive train control,” this technology automatically slows, stops or diverts trains that are headed for a crash, much like a car’s automatic avoidance system does. The technology is still advancing, but autonomous trains — operating with no crew at all — may be rolling in the not too distant future.

 

Even before the arrival of positive train control technology, many railroads — including Amtrak — had downsized to one-person locomotive crews. (Amtrak trains, of course, have conductors and other passenger service workers on board.)

 

The prospect of more one-person crews, never mind self-driving trains, has generated controversy. Railroad unions in particular object, claiming that reduced crews put workers and the public at risk.

 

James Gattuso is a senior research fellow, specializing in regulatory and telecommunications issues for The Heritage Foundation’s Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies.

 

Continue here.

 

This piece originally appeared in The Washington Times



#33 CNJRoss

CNJRoss

    Administrator

  • Admin
  • PipPip
  • 43896 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Fairfax, VA

Posted 08 June 2019 - 06:45 PM

The Hill, 6/3/19:
 

Federal decision on rail staffing sends clear sign to state and federal lawmakers

 

By Ian Jefferies, Opinion Contributor

 

 

 

The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) recently ruled, that, when it comes to the number of crew members in the cab of a locomotive, there simply is no evidence to support the notion that two is better than one. The decision confirms that such a command-and-control policy would limit the evolution of freight railroads, which are innovating to meet growing freight demands.

 

Such definitive action sends a clear signal to federal and state lawmakers: stop pushing similar crew size legislation and leave such decisions where the belong – collective bargaining.

 

At issue are legislative proposals in some states and in Congress that would mandate a fundamental aspect of train operations – these proposals would require a minimum number of on-board freight rail crew members each train must deploy. The measures under consideration would require into perpetuity a crew of at least two crew members in the cab of a locomotive per freight train. Most mainline freight trains currently operate with two crew members, down from five crew members as more technologies have come online. 

 

Such a restriction on U.S. freight railroads is wrong headed for several reasons.

 

Jefferies is the president and CEO of the Association of American Railroads

 

Continue here.



#34 CNJRoss

CNJRoss

    Administrator

  • Admin
  • PipPip
  • 43896 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Fairfax, VA

Posted 08 June 2019 - 06:58 PM

Information Technology & Innovation Foundation, Washington, DC 5/30/19:

 

The Federal Railroad Administration Makes the Right Call on Railroad Staffing Requirements

 

 

 

Regulatory reform is difficult to accomplish on a large scale because it requires a detailed examination of specific market factors, which takes time and expertise to accomplish. On each issue, regulators must balance the desire to promote competition and innovation with the need to protect public safety. A proper understanding of both is difficult to achieve. An example is a recent decision by the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) to withdraw a 2016 notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) that required U.S. railroads to have at least two crew members on most routes. In a step in the right direction, the FRA withdrew the notice. Meanwhile the FRA has recently proposed rules that will require railroads to conduct safety risk reduction programs to identify and mitigate hazards. The result should be to improve public safety while still allowing continuous innovation, including automation.

 

New technology is speeding the automation of several modes of transportation, including railroads. Using new technology has allowed railroads in both the United States and Europe to begin implementing one-person crews over some routes. The recent withdrawal of the two-person crew requirement was an acknowledgement that the original NPRM lacked any evidentiary basis. Railroad safety has been improving over the long-term. Moreover, because the FRA did not require information on crew sizes when an accident occurred, it lacked evidence that one-person crews were more dangerous than two-person crews. The NPRM stated that the FRA “cannot provide reliable or conclusive statistical data to suggest whether one-person crew operations are generally safer or less safe than multiple-person crew operations.”

 

In fact, what data existed pointed in the other direction.  .  .  .

 

SNIP

 

The broad history of technology shows that automation complements rather than eliminates jobs. Although some tasks (often the most dangerous or tedious ones) no longer require a human, labor soon gets shifted to high-value tasks. In the process, public safety is often improved. We should expect the same here. The industry’s strong record of improving safety and its investment in PCT should both be reassuring. Mandating minimum crew sizes in the absence of strong evidence would have added costs without increasing public safety, reducing the return on investment from further technological progress and reducing investment. The FRA made the right decision.

 

 



#35 CNJRoss

CNJRoss

    Administrator

  • Admin
  • PipPip
  • 43896 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Fairfax, VA

Posted 17 June 2019 - 06:19 AM

Railway Age, 6/14/19:
 

The march to one-person crews continues …

 

NS-1man-2.jpg

 

If one looks at recent developments, the Federal Railroad Administration’s withdrawal of the two-person-crew-minimum NPRM (Notice of Proposed Rulemaking), it may seem “logical” to say the march toward one-person crews is accelerating. However, that may be an illusion.

 

While presenting to short line and regional railroad executives at Norfolk Southern’s recent short line marketing meeting in Norfolk, CEO James A. Squires said there are three things that have to happen before the rail industry can “expect” (strong word) one-person crews:

  • “First, the technology. The technology’s got to be there,” he said. Full implementation of PTC (Positive Train Control) would give NS that capability by the end of 2020.
  • Second, “regulations that are, if not conducive to one-man crew operations, at least which do not prohibit one-man crew operations … Moreover, FRA made it very clear … that they intend to preempt state laws governing crew consists. That should give us a powerful tool with which to seek rollback of state laws or proposed laws that seek to mandate two-man crews.” FRA’s decision to drop the rulemaking to mandate two-person train crews indicates that objective is achievable, Squires noted.
  • Third, collective bargaining agreements. With the technology and regulations in place, there will come a time, Squires said, when NS seeks to bargain on crew consist changes.

 

At this point in time, I believe Squires has made what could be considered to be a “logical” assessment of the facts and circumstances, but …

 

Continue here.



#36 CNJRoss

CNJRoss

    Administrator

  • Admin
  • PipPip
  • 43896 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Fairfax, VA

Posted 20 June 2019 - 12:49 PM

BLET News Flash:

 

At U.S. House hearing, BLET President Pierce testifies for two-person crews, asks Congress to block Mexican crews from operating in U.S.

 

 

INDEPENDENCE, Ohio, June 20 — Dennis Pierce, National President of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen (BLET) and President of the Teamsters Rail Conference, urged members of Congress to support a national two-person crew law and asked them to block Mexican train crews from operating in the United States during a hearing before the U.S. House of Representatives today.

Testifying before the House’s Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, and Hazardous Materials at a hearing titled “The State of the Rail Workforce,” President Pierce also strongly condemned the practice of Precision Scheduled Railroading (PSR) and the negative impact it has on rail worker safety. Throughout his testimony, President Pierce was highly critical of the Federal Railroad Administration’s failure to regulate railroad companies, which has led to the industry becoming less safe than it should be.

Pierce Condemns PSR

Even though railroad workers are more productive and efficient than ever before, an increasing number are being furloughed as the rail industry cuts to the bone and compromises safety in order to pursue increased profit margins under the moniker of Precision Scheduled Railroading (PSR).

“What is The State of the Rail Workforce? I unfortunately must report to you that — while rail worker productivity has never been better and Class I railroads have enjoyed multi-billion-dollar profits for many years — employment levels are headed in the other direction, with hundreds — if not thousands — of furloughs,” President Pierce said.

The PSR management style is neither precise nor scheduled, as President Pierce pointed out. It is impossible for rail workers to receive scheduled on-duty times or accurate train line-ups that predict work start times, which contributes to fatigue.

“[U]nfortunately, the quality of many Class I train lineups has become another victim of the PSR mentality,” President Pierce testified. “As a result, train crews are routinely called to go to work, unable to obtain meaningful rest, all because the employer-provided prediction for their next work shift was completely inaccurate. Put yourself in this proverbial Catch-22 — if I tell them I am too tired to work safely, I could be terminated. The days of this treatment must come to an end.”

He also condemned railroad company attendance policies, which are counterproductive to safety and do little to mitigate employee fatigue. “And many Carriers have implemented draconian attendance policies, forcing employees to report to work even when not fully rested due to poor predictability. Forcing employees to work fatigued in order to avoid discipline endangers both the workforce and the general public,” he said.

FRA Won’t Regulate

President Pierce said that the Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008 mandated the FRA to implement fatigue mitigation regulations, but nothing has been done in that regard for more than a decade. Such fatigue mitigation regulations could have provided a useful tool in combating the industry’s PSR mentality, but the FRA still has not finalized a regulation on the RSIA mandate. President Pierce urged lawmakers to act instead. “Ironically, Congress mandated fatigue mitigation programs in 2008 — but FRA still hasn’t finalized that regulation. This Committee should act to ensure that meaningful steps are taken to mitigate fatigue as Congress commanded 11 years ago,” President Pierce said.

Excessive Train Lengths Caused by PSR

President Pierce also took the FRA to task for its refusal to take even the slightest interest in the longer and longer trains that have become a cornerstone of the PSR operating model. The ever-increasing use of Distributed Power (or “DP”) locomotive consists — where extra locomotives are placed in the middle and rear of trains and are controlled via telemetry from the head end — has led to longer and longer trains. In DP operations, a single locomotive engineer is charged with the responsibility of controlling and operating these longer and longer trains. Under PSR, however, train lengths have become so great that engineers are regularly losing communication with the rear of their trains, preventing them from making emergency brake applications in the event something goes wrong.

“This push for longer trains with fewer crews has reached a breaking point. The limits of telemetry that allows an engineer to control the rear of a train from the head end are being exceeded, and in-train communications losses are becoming commonplace. A blockage in a train’s brake system and a communications loss can have catastrophic results … yet FRA does nothing to address the situation,” President Pierce said.

Two-Person Train Crews

But the most significant public debate today is over the size of train crews. The industry argues that, in some cases, PTC has made the two-person crew redundant, and that a job should be eliminated. However, President Pierce testified that PTC is not designed or intended to prevent all accidents, and that PTC cannot prevent low speed collisions. Nor does it reduce the potential for accidents at highway/rail crossings caused by motorists who fail to yield to the train.

“In other words, PTC is not the silver bullet that some would have you believe,” Pierce testified.

He called out the FRA for failing to do its job and urged Congress to support a national two-person crew law.

“In spite of all of this, the industry’s safety regulator has again refused to regulate,” Pierce testified. “Although the previous Administration promulgated a rule making that would have required two crew members on many forms of freight service, the current Administration has withdrawn that rule making. In doing so, FRA has further attempted to ‘negatively preempt’ all State laws that make any effort to legislate crew size. For all of these reasons, and to ensure the safety of all rail workers, we strongly support H.R. 1748 — The Safe Freight Act of 2019 — which has been sponsored by Congressman Young and has over six dozen bipartisan cosponsors. We urge passage of this Bill by the House and the Senate, and that President Trump sign it into law.”

Mexican Crews Operating Inside the U.S.

President Pierce also touched upon the BLET’s ongoing dispute with the Kansas City Southern, which last year began using Mexican nationals to operate freight trains inside the United States for about nine miles inside along its Tex-Mex Railway subsidiary. The Mexican train crews are not held to the same engineer certification standards that U.S. train crews must maintain, which is a degradation of safety. After almost a year of inaction on the issue by the White House and the FRA, President Pierce said the BLET is seeking a law that says, “Trains originating in Mexico may only be operated in the United States by crews comprised entirely of citizens or nationals of the United States.”

In Conclusion

President Pierce concluded his testimony by praising all hard working locomotive engineers and trainmen throughout the United States. “Despite the difficulties I have talked about today, America’s rail workforce provides the best railroad transportation in the world,” he said.

Peter DeFazio (D-OR) serves as Chair of the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and Rep. Daniel Lipinski (D-IL) serves as Chair of the Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines and Hazardous Materials.

Additional witnesses at the June 20 hearing included: John Previsich, President, SMART Transportation Division; Jerry C. Boles, President, Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen; Andrew W. Sandberg, Assistant to the President, Directing General Chairman, IAM District Lodge 19; William Gonzalez, President, Amtrak Police Fraternal Order of Police Labor Committee; Ronald L. Batory, Administrator, Federal Railroad Administration; and Ian Jefferies, President & CEO, Association of American Railroads.

A copy of President Pierce’s written testimony is available on the BLET website.

 



#37 CNJRoss

CNJRoss

    Administrator

  • Admin
  • PipPip
  • 43896 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Fairfax, VA

Posted 22 June 2019 - 08:43 PM

The Washington Post, 6/20/19:

House committee leader says railroads have fallen to ‘jackals on Wall Street’

 

 

 

House Transportation Committee Chairman Peter A. DeFazio said Thursday that the nation’s railway system had fallen into the hands of “the jackals on Wall Street,” accusing federal regulators of colluding with them.

 

“Wall Street is setting the terms and pressuring executives,” DeFazio (D-Ore.) said at a hearing, “and they aren’t concerned about safety. Their monthly or quarterly profits are what is watched by Wall Street. Only if there’s an absolutely catastrophic accident that bankrupts a railroad will they care about it, but short of that, they don’t give a damn.”

 

For more that two hours, lawmakers challenged Federal Railroad Administration head Ronald L. Batory about three-mile-long trains that block railway crossings and his decision to withdraw a proposed rule that would have mandated two-member crews on most trains.

 

Continue here.



#38 CNJRoss

CNJRoss

    Administrator

  • Admin
  • PipPip
  • 43896 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Fairfax, VA

Posted 27 June 2019 - 06:05 AM

RT&S 6/26/19
 

U.S. Senators push for two-person crews on freight trains

 

 

Senators Edward Markey (D-Mass.) and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) introduced the Safe Freight Act on June 26. The legislation would promote rail safety by mandating at least two-person crews on all freight trains in the U.S. The bill is designed to correct the Federal Railroad Administration’s recent rollback of a proposed rule that would have established these necessary safety standards.

 

The Safe Freight Act will specifically require that all freight trains have at least one certified conductor and one certified engineer on board, who can then work together to protect the safety of both the train and people living near the tracks.

 

Continue here.



#39 CNJRoss

CNJRoss

    Administrator

  • Admin
  • PipPip
  • 43896 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Fairfax, VA

Posted 27 June 2019 - 05:41 PM

BLET news flash:
 

Two-person crew bill introduced in United States Senate

 

 

INDEPENDENCE, Ohio, June 27 — A two-person crew bill was introduced in the United States Senate on June 26. The Safe Freight Act, a companion bill to H.R. 1748 in the U.S. House of Representatives, would promote rail safety by mandating at least two-person crews on all freight trains in the United States. The bill was introduced by Senators Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.) and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.).

According to a press release from Senator Markey’s office: “The bill is designed to correct the Federal Railroad Administration’s recent rollback of a proposed rule that would have established these necessary safety standards. The Safe Freight Act will specifically require that all freight trains have at least one certified conductor and one certified engineer on board, who can then work together to protect the safety of both the train and people living near the tracks.”

Other Senators co-sponsoring the Safe Freight Act are Senators Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), Angus King (I-Maine), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Tina Smith (D-Minn.), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), and Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.).

“The FRA abdicated its responsibility as our nation’s rail safety agency when it withdrew the proposed two-person crew rule,” Senator Markey said. “A series of tragic accidents have resulted in recent years from unattended and understaffed trains, making clear that we need enough crew on board to protect both property and the public. I am proud to lead the introduction of the Safe Freight Act with Senator Wyden to address this critical safety concern.”

Senator Markey cited the 2013 tragedy in Lac-Mégantic, Quebec where an unattended freight train carrying 72 tank cars of crude oil derailed and exploded, killing 47 people, destroying much of the town, and causing millions of dollars in environmental damage. The train was operated by a single employee.

“The decision by the FRA to abandon its planned two-person crew rule makes no sense, especially in light of recent rail accidents,” said Senator Wyden. “This is a matter of safety and security for rail crew and the public, and experts agree. It’s now up to Congress to step in and require freight trains have the staffing required to keep folks safe.”

“The Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen has led the fight for railroad safety for over 156 years,” said BLET National President Dennis R. Pierce. “Two-person crews make for safer, more efficient train operations, and two-person crews play a key role in safeguarding our nation’s communities when a serious accident occurs. I congratulate Senator Markey for stepping up to lead the fight for a safer railroad industry and a safer America.”

“SMART Transportation Division has been working tirelessly to promote safety in the railroad industry,” said SMART Transportation Division President John Previsich. “There is no doubt that the safest rail operation is a two-person crew operation. After several major train derailments, we must send a clear message to our lawmakers and the general public that multi-person crews are essential to ensuring the safest rail operations possible in their communities. I would like to thank Senator Markey for his leadership on this critical issue as we continue improve safety on our nation''''s railroads for both our members and the general public.”

In the U.S. House of Representatives, Rep. Don Young (R-Alaska) introduced H.R. 1748 on March 22, 2019. Also known as the Safe Freight Act, the House version of the bill would also require that two certified crew members operate freight trains the United States. It currently has 74 co-sponsors.

A copy of the Senate’s Safe Freight Act can be found here (PDF).

 



#40 CNJRoss

CNJRoss

    Administrator

  • Admin
  • PipPip
  • 43896 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Fairfax, VA

Posted 10 September 2019 - 08:05 AM

RT&S, 9/6/19
 

Nevada AFL-CIO takes stand on train crew issue

 

 

The debate between railroad management and agreement employees continued yesterday with the Nevada State AFL-CIO adopting a resolution that requests Federal action on the question of train crew size.

 

The labor organization says that the most effective way to maintain railroad safety is to adopt the new technology coming on the scene, but also ensuring that freight trains have appropriate crews.  The debate, of course, centers around having two crew members in the cab of every freight train.

 

Continue here.






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users