Jump to content


Photo

Amtrak Tried to Help Evacuate NOL


  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1 AlanB

AlanB

    Member

  • Global Moderator
  • PipPip
  • 2166 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Queens, NY

Posted 11 September 2005 - 11:02 AM

In fact, while the last regularly scheduled train out of town had left a few hours earlier, Amtrak had decided to run a "dead-head" train that evening to move equipment out of the city. It was headed for high ground in Macomb, Miss., and it had room for several hundred passengers. "We offered the city the opportunity to take evacuees out of harm's way," said Amtrak spokesman Cliff Black. "The city declined."

So the ghost train left New Orleans at 8:30 p.m., with no passengers on board.


The above quote comes from a general article detailing the Meltdown in New Orleans. The full story from MSNBC.
Alan,

Take care and take trains!

#2 AlanB

AlanB

    Member

  • Global Moderator
  • PipPip
  • 2166 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Queens, NY

Posted 11 September 2005 - 03:16 PM

Yet another interesting quote from the same article that I linked to above.

But assistance that was available was often blocked. In the Gulf, not 100 miles away from New Orleans, sat the 844-foot USS Bataan, equipped with six operating rooms and beds for 600 patients. Starting Wednesday, Amtrak offered to run a twice-a-day shuttle for as many as 600 evacuees from a rail yard west of New Orleans to Lafayette, La. The first run was not organized until Saturday. Officials then told Amtrak they would not require any more trains.


Alan,

Take care and take trains!

#3 AmtrakFan

AmtrakFan

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 246 posts
  • Location:Downers Grove,IL BNSF MP21
  • Interests:Trains, Baseball(Cubs and Red Sox), Football(Lions),Photograhy, Computers,Travel, Coins and Bickcycling.

Posted 11 September 2005 - 04:39 PM

Wow maybe there wouldn't be so many problmes if the city used Amtrak to McComb, MS.
John Poshepny

#4 AlanB

AlanB

    Member

  • Global Moderator
  • PipPip
  • 2166 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Queens, NY

Posted 11 September 2005 - 05:25 PM

Wow maybe there wouldn't be so many problmes if the city used Amtrak to McComb, MS.

View Post


I suspect that there also would have been less problems had FEMA taken up Amtrak on it's offer as of Wednesday, instead of waiting until Saturday. They would have needed far fewer buses in NOL, to run people between the Dome and the Convention Center, over to the train.

That would have meant less overall traffic on the few remaining highway's into NOL. That of course would have made it easier to get supplies and relief into the city.

It also would have meant that those very same people who were starving and dying of thirst, would have received at least one meal and some very needed water while they were on the fully stocked train. Buses of course are not equiped to supply food and water. And the school buses that were eventually used and probably represented at least 40% of the fleet used in evacuations, don't even have bathrooms. :o

That again is something that Amtrak of course could have provided, had their offer been properly accepted and utilized.
Alan,

Take care and take trains!

#5 BillMagee

BillMagee

    Administrator

  • Admin
  • PipPip
  • 5369 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cherry Hill, NJ
  • Interests:Travel, Rail, Aviation, Sports

Posted 11 September 2005 - 08:18 PM

I detect a little re-writing of history here. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the initial offer of an Amtrak train was made on Wednesday, August 31 (as reported by the Jackson MS Clarion-Ledger and linked on OTOL). But, unlike what is now being reported, there was no train or route available on 8/31 and certainly no way to run two trains a day starting that day as is now being implied. According to the original article, on 8/31 routing logistics were still being arranged and the train was not yet available. According to BNSF press releases, their line into Avondale Yard in New Orleans was not inspected, repaired and reopened until late Thursday, September 1. Given that daylight operation was almost mandatory, Amtrak had no route into New Orleans until Friday morning, 9/2. Add to that the fact that Amtrak did not have even one train positioned until Friday, 9/2. The fact is the trains were made available at as early a date as Amtrak could ready them and that day was Friday, 9/2, not Wednesday 8/31. So at best, the earliest Amtrak could have run one evacuation train was Friday and by then it was already too little and too late. By that time two other actions had made the Amtrak offer moot. One: Texas had already taken as many evacuees as they could handle (and the only practical destination for Amtrak evacuees was Texas). Second: Armstrong Airport had both runways, ATC, and IFR operational and evacuation by air to any US destination was now possible, practical, and far more effective that putting them on a train for a 130 mile ride to busses that had nowhere to go. I really do not think the Amtrak plan was practical, particularly by the time it was available. Witness that the one evacuation train, operated 9/3 (one day after the train was actually available) train took a grand total of 97 evacuees: less than single 737 and barely more than two busses. The reason Amtrak was not used may just be because, by the time Amtrak was a real option, it was not all that useful.

Edited by BillMagee, 11 September 2005 - 08:38 PM.


#6 ICGsteve

ICGsteve

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 1542 posts

Posted 11 September 2005 - 09:49 PM

The Mayor of NO was on Tim Rusert today. He siad that he is not aware of Amtrak making the effort to notify the city of an offer to move citizens on the hospital train out of the city in advance of the storm. I think that this is on the radar of journalists so we get to the bottom of just what the offer was and whom it was made to. One thing we do know is that in the plans it was agreed by all that the city had the responsibility of moving citizens out of harms way. The Mayor disputed Rusert on the idea that the plan was to move everyone out of the city. He said that it was to get as many out of the city as possible and move everyone else to the Superdome out of harms way. It looks very much like the city leaders had a mindset that taking Amtrak up on an offer to move people out on this one train was more trouble than it was worth, that they thus turned down the offer without even bringing the mayor into the discussion, but we don't know yet that this is what happened.

#7 AlanB

AlanB

    Member

  • Global Moderator
  • PipPip
  • 2166 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Queens, NY

Posted 11 September 2005 - 11:37 PM

I detect a little re-writing of history here.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the initial offer of an Amtrak train was made on Wednesday, August 31 (as reported by the Jackson MS Clarion-Ledger and linked on OTOL).  But, unlike what is now being reported, there was no train or route available on 8/31 and certainly no way to run two trains a day starting that day as is now being implied.  According to the original article, on 8/31 routing logistics were still being arranged and the train was not yet available.  According to BNSF press releases, their line into Avondale Yard in New Orleans was not inspected, repaired and reopened until late Thursday, September 1.


Bill, on the above points you would appear to be correct. Amtrak only offered on Wednesday, they were not in a position to actually start on Wednesday. However, the country didn't start really learning of the problems at the Dome and especially the Convention Center (CC) until Thursday and Friday, with evacuations still on going on Sunday the 4th.

Given that daylight operation was almost mandatory, Amtrak had no route into New Orleans until Friday morning, 9/2.  Add to that the fact that Amtrak did not have even one train positioned until Friday, 9/2.  The fact is the trains were made available at as early a date as Amtrak could ready them and that day was Friday, 9/2, not Wednesday 8/31.  So at best, the earliest Amtrak could have run one evacuation train was Friday and by then it was already too little and too late.


Actually daylight was not mandatory. The first run into NOL was originally scheduled to depart towards NOL on 9/2 at 7:00 pm, with a departure time of Midnight. That run however got cancelled, by FEMA to my knowledge, because they had no buses to get people over to the train.

As I noted above though, trains could have and should have run all day on Friday and Saturday, as they were still moving large numbers of people into Sunday morning.

By that time two other actions had made the Amtrak offer moot.  One: Texas had already taken as many evacuees as they could handle (and the only practical destination for Amtrak evacuees was Texas).  Second: Armstrong Airport had both runways, ATC, and IFR operational and evacuation by air to any US destination was now possible, practical, and far more effective that putting them on a train for a 130 mile ride to busses that had nowhere to go.


As noted in the same article that I had linked to originally, FEMA also screwed up the evacuation from the airport. So this option wasn't as viable as it might seem. I quote from the article:

Anger was also rising at federal officials, who often seemed to be getting in the way. At Louis Armstrong International Airport, commercial airlines had been flying in supplies and taking out evacuees since Monday. But on Thursday, after FEMA took over the evacuation, aviation director Roy A. Williams complained that "we are packed with evacuees and the planes are not being loaded and there are gaps of two or three hours when no planes are arriving." Eventually, he started fielding "calls from various airlines saying, 'Well, we are being told by FEMA that you don't need any planes.' And of course we need planes. I had thousands of people on the concourses."


Additionally getting people from the Dome and the CC to the airport was much harder than it would have been to reach Amtrak. In fact, to my knowledge, very few of those trapped at the dome or the CC left via the airport. Most people from those two places, rode buses the whole way to where ever they ended up.

I really do not think the Amtrak plan was practical, particularly by the time it was available.  Witness that the one evacuation train, operated 9/3 (one day after the train was actually available) train took a grand total of 97 evacuees: less than single 737 and barely more than two busses.  The reason Amtrak was not used may just be because, by the time Amtrak was a real option, it was not all that useful.

View Post


As I posted elsewhere in response to a similar statement by you I believe, the train left so empty, because of the ability of officials to control the buses needed to get people to the train. It was not a lack of people available that caused it to leave so empty.
Alan,

Take care and take trains!

#8 NickG

NickG

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 5396 posts
  • Location:Philadelphia, PA

Posted 12 September 2005 - 02:21 PM

From NewsMax, 9/12/05:

Amtrak, Nagin Argue Over Rescue Train

Officials at Amtrak say they offered to run a special train out of New Orleans that could have evacuated hundreds of residents hours before Hurricane Katrina struck - but city officials turned the offer down.

"We offered the city the opportunity to take evacuees out of harm's way," Amtrak spokesman Cliff Black told the Washington Post on Sunday. "The city declined."
...
New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin said Sunday he had no idea what Black was talking about.

The full story is here. In other news, FEMA director Michael Brown has just resigned.
Nick Gibbon

New York, NY/Philadelphia, PA




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users