Jump to content


Photo

CSX - Shrink the Water Level Route?


  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1 CNJRoss

CNJRoss

    Administrator

  • Admin
  • PipPip
  • 43493 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Fairfax, VA

Posted 15 August 2017 - 07:58 AM

Trains 'Fred Frailey Blog,' 8/13/17:
 

Shrink the Water Level Route?

 

 

CSX has been studying the feasibility of single-tracking its route from Chicago to Selkirk (Albany), N.Y. But is it feasible, people are asking? Wouldn’t the railroad grind to a halt? Some of you have already said as much in comments to an earlier blog.

 

I decided to find out. A couple of years ago I built a simulation model for CXS between Buffalo and Selkirk using interactive Train Dispatcher 3 software. I’ve just employed this platform to run the trains actually operated over the territory on a recent midweek day. Then I went into the software, removed 100 miles of double track over the 295-mile stretch—and reran those same trains.

 

SNIP

 

The price of removing those 100 miles is a 28 percent increase in delays, caused either by waiting at red signals or being unable to make track speed. That extra lost time adds up to 23 hours. Because I tried to observe train priories—Amtrak, intermodal, auto, manifest, local, industrial, in that order—those trains at the low end suffered most, and the Amtrak and intermodal trains least.

 

More here.



#2 KevinKorell

KevinKorell

    Board Leader

  • Sr. Admin
  • PipPip
  • 82532 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lakewood, NJ
  • Interests:Making America TRAIN again!

Posted 15 August 2017 - 05:17 PM

No matter how one justifies it, single tracking is negative progress.    Scheduling meets assumes that all trains involved are on time, and we know they can't always be.

 

And it's counter-productive given that Albany-Schenectady was just double tracked.



Kevin Korell


OTOL Board Leader


Lakewood, NJ





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users